HOT TOPIC !
A Family Guide to Response to Intervention
the National Center for Learning Disabilities
FOR MORE, Response-to-Intervention (RTI) resources, click here.
is dedicated to the effective implementation of Response to Intervention (RTI) in school districts nationwide. Our goal is to guide educators and families in the large-scale implementation of RTI so that each child has access to quality instruction and that struggling students – including those with learning disabilities – are identified early and receive the necessary supports to be successful.
Helping Educators Discuss Responsiveness
The Blueprints were developed jointly by National Association of State Directors of Special Education, Inc. (NASDSE) and the Council of Administrators of Special Education (CASE)
Response to Intervention Blueprints for Implementation: District Level
Response to Intervention Blueprints for Implementation: School Building Level
Response to Intervention: Research for Practice
Author: Amy-Jane Griffiths, Lorien B. Parson, Matthew K. Burns, Amanda VanDerHeyden and W. David Tilly
Response to intervention (RtI) is a research-based strategy that has proven positive outcomes for many students, including those with disabilities.
Over and over again, we see people get very excited about the latest ideas, buzzwords, and cure-alls for the educational system. This excitement makes whatever is in vogue the thing to do to help children learn, not just one group of children or another, but all children. Many feel the urge to support each new thing. After all, we are social creatures and we want to do what others are doing. We are quick to jump on bandwagons, especially when the needs of our education system are so great and the resources so limited.
The Latest Buzzwords: Response-to-Intervention
One of the most notable buzzwords today is “Response to Intervention” (RtI). In this paper, I will explore how RtI came to be, what it means for helping children learn, and how it can be used as a method for identifying children with Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD). I conclude that RtI is an important change that should receive widespread adoption in the schools, but that its use in disability determination requires further scrutiny. (Wrightslaw)
Background: What are the origins of Recognition & Response?
Recognition & Response is based on an approach called Response to Intervention (RTI) designed for school-age children who are at risk for learning disabilities. RTI emphasizes early intervening rather than waiting until children fail. Teachers use early and intensive interventions in the general education classroom before they refer children with learning difficulties for further assessment and special education services. A major premise of RTI is that early intervening can prevent academic problems for many students and determine which students actually have learning disabilities versus those whose underachievement can be attributed to other factors, such as inadequate instruction. Because RTI includes an emphasis on the quality of the general education curriculum, this approach offers potential benefits to every student and not just to those who experience some type of learning problem. The key components of RTI (and Recognition & Response) are systematic screening and progress monitoring, the use of multiple tiers of increasingly intense interventions, and a problem-solving process to aid in decision-making. In both approaches (RTI and Recognition & Response), there is an emphasis on using interventions that have been found to be effective through scientific research and on linking assessment results to interventions that are specifically tailored to address individual needs.
http://www.recognitionandresponse.org/
Understanding Responsiveness to Intervention in Learning Disabilities Determination
Responsiveness to Intervention in the SLD Determination Process
Executive Summary of the NRCLD Symposium on Responsiveness to Intervention